Petitioner made the federation, secretary cabinet and secretary parliamentary affairs as respondents in the case.
“Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa had set three conditions in his decision with regard to promulgation of an ordinance,” petition read.
“In these conditions emergency and immediate need were basic elements,” according to petition.
READ: PTI challenges SC Practice and Procedure Ordinance in SHC
“Currently there is no calamity or any emergency situation, the ordinance promulgated in presence of the parliament, which is unconstitutional,” petition read.
“In presence of the apex court’s decision, the law could not be amended with an ordinance,” petitioner argued.
It is to be mentioned that the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act 2023, has been recently amended with a presidential ordinance.
