IHC verdict lifting ban on political discussions in jail visits challenged

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad administration has challenged the Islamabad High Court’s (IHC) verdict that declared the clause prohibiting political discussions between prisoners and their visitors as unconstitutional, ARY News reported.

The capital city administration approached the IHC through the chief commissioner office and filed an intra-court appeal, requesting the court to set-aside the verdict of a single bench.

A division bench headed by Chief Justice IHC Aamir Farooq and comprising Justice Saman Riffat will hear the challenging plea on Tuesday.

Earlier on October 31, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan ruled that such restrictions violate the fundamental right to freedom of expression, as enshrined in Pakistan’s constitution.

The verdict was announced after Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leaders were barred from discussing political matters with their incarcerated founder Imran Khan at Adila Jail with prisoners, prompting a petition to strike down Section 265 of the jail rules.

PTI’s Sher Afzal Marwat approached the IHC, requesting it to set aside the Section 265 of the jail rules. The court rejected Advocate General’s objections on maintainability of the petition and passed the directives.

Despite being asked to respond three months ago, the Punjab government had failed to submit its reply.

Read More: Court to hear pleas over PTI founder’s jail meetings

Earlier, Sher Afzal Marwat challenged the ban on meetings with PTI founder Imran Khan.

Punjab home department had banned meetings with the PTI founder in Adiala Jail, citing security threats.

Marwat in his plea in Islamabad High Court (IHC) argued that the provincial home department has not been authorized to impose ban on meetings in jail.

He  pleaded to the court to declare the ban order as void. He said that all parliamentarians will stage protest if the ban on meetings with the party’s leader not lifted