Panamagate: Punjab CM sues Imran for 'Rs10billion bribe allegation'
- By Web Desk -
- Jul 07, 2017
LAHORE: Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif on Friday sued Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf chairman Imran Khan for Rs10 billion damages for accusing him of offering bribe to stay silent over the Panama Papers allegations against the Sharif family, ARY News reported.
The chief minister filed the defamation suit through his lawyer Mustafa Ramday against Khan for not tendering apology in the wake of a legal notice issued to him by the CM asking him to offer apology for leveling ‘baseless’ allegations.
After initial hearing, a local court issued notice to the PTI chairman to submit his reply to the defamation suit by July 21.
In his lawsuit CM Shahbaz said,“The defendant (Imran Khan) leveled maliciously false, baseless and unfounded allegations against him.” “He also leveled the same allegations no less than three times in television programme ‘Off the Record’ aired on ARY News on April 26 this year.”
The plaintiff said that he had served a legal notice through his counsel on the defendant on May 08, 2017 under Section 8 of the Defamation Ordinance, 2002 calling upon him to tender a proper apology within 14 days of the receipt of the notice. Upon failing, he warned, he will initiate legal action against the defendant for recovery of Rs10 billion as damages under the law. However, Khan failed to tender apology.
Sharif’s lawyer said that considering the seriousness of defamatory allegations and consistency which he leveled allegations with, his client is entitled to the claim of compensation.
With the Panama Papers revelations about the first family’s London properties having triggered political storm in Pakistan, the PTI chairman went to claim that the Punjab CM had offered him Rs10 billion through one of his close associate to stay silent over the Panamagate case.
Earlier, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leaders demanded Khan to disclose the name of the person who convened offer to him. To which the PTI chairman said that over disclosure of the name, the person could face the wrath of the rulers, as what he had said, the ruling party was not a democratic party but a group of fascists scapegoating others to safeguard their personal interests.