IHC gives opportunity to India to appoint lawyer for Kulbhushan Jadhav

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has given an opportunity to India for appointing a lawyer for the arrested spy Kulbhushan Jadhav, ARY News reported on Tuesday.

A larger bench of the high court headed by Chief Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Amir Farooq, and Justice Mian Gull Hassan Aurangzeb heard the case related to the appointment of defence lawyer for Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav.

Attorney General of Pakistan Khalid Jawed Khan and senior lawyer Hamid Khan appeared in the hearing as amici curiae, whereas, Makhdoom Ali Khan and Abid Hassan Manto recused themselves to assist to the court in the case.

Read: Pakistan gave third consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav under ICJ judgment: FO

CJ IHC Justice Athar Minallah questioned AGP Khalid Jawed Khan regarding the progress in the case. He told the court that the foreign ministry contacted the India’s ministry for external affairs where the New Delhi expressed unseriousness over the matters related to Kulbhushan Jadhav.

The attorney general added that a representative of the Indian embassy had also been contacted in this regards, however, they showed unwillingness to appoint counsel for Jadhav. The Indian government blamed Pakistani authorities for not giving a meaningful consular access, said Khan.

He said the Indian government restricted itself to launch political statements against Pakistan and seemingly not worried for the sentence of Kulbhushan Jadhav nor it is willing to defend its spy in the case. The Pakistani authorities apprised Jadhav regarding the court directives besides passing an ordinance to give opportunity to the Indian spy for appointing a counsel, said attorney general.

Read: Pakistan notifies India of their last shot at appointing lawyer for Jadhav

Khalid Jawed Khan read the ordinance in the courtroom which stated that India had been sent a letter on September 4, 2020. In a response letter on September 7, 2020, India raised four objections against the ordinance passed by the Pakistan’s parliament; consular access to Jadhav; granting permission to appoint a lawyer from foreign country and taking up the issue of India’s sovereignty to appear in a Pakistani court.

He said that the Indian government had also blamed Pakistan for giving an impression to facilitate Kulbhushan Jadhav through the ordinance but the legal procedures were unclear. The Indian authorities have been responded that the court will clarify the legal procedures, he added.

India could contact the court for getting the related documents, however, their response shows unwillingness to run away from the legal proceedings against Kulbhushan Jadhav, said Khalid Jawed Khan.

Read: Govt files petition in IHC seeking appointment of lawyer for Indian spy

“The federal government is asking for the appointment of a counsel for Kulbhushan, on the other hand, India is giving an impression for the violation of the verdict announced by International Court of Justice (ICJ). India has been given a full opportunity to appoint its representative in the court as Pakistan is willing to hold a transparent trial of Kulbhushan Jadhav.”

The IHC chief justice remarked that the amici curiae should assist to court regarding the previous rulings of the international court in the same genre of cases. The basic motive is to ensure a meaningful implementation of the ICJ’s verdict in the case, he added.

Justice Minallah remarked that India could contact directly to the court by filing a plea besides sending its representative in the case.

Read: Pakistan afforded Kulbhushan Jadhav opportunity to file review petition: FO

Later, the court adjourned the hearing till November 9.

Kulbhushan Jadhav has been in Pakistan’s custody following his arrest from Balochistan in a counter-intelligence operation on March 3, 2016. During the investigation, he confessed to his involvement in terrorist activities inside Pakistan that resulted in the loss of many precious human lives.

He also made important revelations about RAW’s role in sponsoring state terrorism in Pakistan.